2003 M 3 2 jvMar. 200337 1 Journal of Henan Agricultural University Vol.37 No.1l :2002-11-10 “: 2 8 S/1 “(012201220)Te: (1956-), 3, g , 2 jv q,V Y ! T.cI|:1000-2340(2003)01-0054-03I Nr Z孫治強,趙永英,李勝利,張艷玲(河南農業(yè)大學林學園藝學院,河南鄭州450002)K1:研究了鋸末為主的復配基質對番茄幼苗生長發(fā)育的影響.結果表明,以腐熟鋸末為主育番茄苗時,不出現幼苗黃化和出苗不齊現象,幼苗前期(28 d以前)生長緩慢,生長速度遠低于對照;從28 d開始,鋸末復合基質中幼苗生長速度開始加快,以 V(鋸末):V(蛭石):V(煤灰)=6:2:2時表現最優(yōu),42 d時番茄幼苗與對照已無差異.因此,培育42 d左右的番茄幼苗時,腐熟鋸末可替代草炭作為育苗基質.1oM:鋸末;無土育苗;基質;番茄ms |:S 641.2 DS M :AStudy on substrate formulation of soilless SeedlingLycopersicum esculentumSUN Zhi-qiang,ZHAO Yong-ying,LISheng-li,ZHANG Yan-ling(College of Forestry and Horticulture ,HenanAgricultural University ,Zhengzhou 450002,China)Abstract:A study was conducted on the effect of the compound substrate with sawdust as the main material on thegrowth and development of Lycopersicum esculentum seedling.The results showed that Lycopersicum esculentum seedlingsowed in coast sawdust germinatedwithout any abnormal phenomenon, but the growth of seedling was slow within 28 dafter sowing and had significant differencewith theCK.While after 28 d, growth of Lycopersicum esculentum seedling insawdust became fast and at 42 d after sowing, therewas no statistically differencebetween seedlings of sawdust and theCK.So sawdust can be the substitute for peat as seedling substrate.Key words:sawdust;soilless seedling;substrates;Lycopersicum esculentum“ - v r ,X 、 “15. v PrT z, s KK 4.yNS =M? 7Z 9. . T v PrT 1 . ?T9I N 2 . 2Z/“ u, R V) B z 4 . KB, PrT 9 4 9. TB !l , W,N ,Bt 9 !SE F 28 d vK,7 Ov、7、 ? v, VCKz) s A. ) W 39 7 SVCs, S (M12VCKz,M5M13Q,VC M6,M9M10 . ,28 d - H, 1 +v 7 SAC, X 7 S ,VC 3 v 7.35 dI N 21 d28 dM1, vsv l, M12 , 7vX s.M12M5I N ? 3 z, O v,VC ) M6M10 , - Ss (A. Vn,l28d, I N 3B1 H , 1 + 7 Sr?,I N v9,v vv l,tS .Vv.56 2 j v 37 V2 H Z H I N 3YTable 2 The effect of different substrates formulation on Lycopersicum esculentum seedling growth at different stage) TR21 d/cmStem heightY/mmStem diameter FW/(g-1)DW/(mg-1)28 d/cmStem heightY/mmStem diameter FW/(g-1)DW/(mg-1)M1 2.37 1.23 0.19 11.17 4.34 1.67 0.54 47.50M2 2.51 1.34 0.20 12.07 4.15 1.68 0.50 44.60M3 2.64 1.27 0.17 11.00 4.51 1.71 0.52 43.73M4 2.45 1.22 0.20 12.13 4.53 1.85 0.52 45.47M5 2.41 1.22 0.24 14.67 4.67 1.89 0.61 49.93M6 2.21 1.23 0.14 9.40 3.67 1.63 0.34 29.80M7 2.65 1.18 0.18 10.80 3.87 1.64 0.43 37.47M8 2.35 1.33 0.19 11.47 4.41 1.82 0.52 46.93M9 2.27 1.11 0.14 9.73 3.92 1.72 0.32 28.00M10 2.40 1.16 0.13 8.53 3.70 1.67 0.33 29.27M11 2.17 1.26 0.18 11.13 4.21 1.75 0.51 43.00M12 2.79 1.27 0.23 14.27 4.91 1.98 0.72 66.07M13 2.40 1.24 0.19 11.93 4.85 1.82 0.60 52.93M14 4.30 1.77 0.41 22.46 7.46 2.53 1.16 95.93) TR35 d/cmStem heightY/mmStem diameter FW/(g-1)DW/(mg-1)42 d/cmStem heightY/mmStem diameter FW/(g-1)DW/(mg-1)M1 7.10 2.54 1.54 132.0 10.90 3.11 3.35 251.0M2 6.39 2.26 1.06 93.8 9.40 2.73 2.79 210.2M3 6.67 2.39 1.31 115.0 12.10 2.97 3.41 252.6M4 7.36 2.59 1.60 138.7 13.63 3.19 4.20 324.0M5 8.26 2.67 1.64 142.5 14.10 3.27 4.55 377.6M6 5.62 1.95 0.81 68.9 9.47 2.93 2.61 200.6M7 7.04 2.16 1.32 116.8 12.19 3.01 3.48 265.6M8 7.73 2.46 1.43 130.1 13.17 3.17 3.51 286.6M9 7.13 2.32 1.37 116.2 13.59 3.15 3.69 294.8M10 6.49 2.38 1.21 107.1 11.53 2.89 3.27 250.8M11 7.09 2.47 1.38 121.3 11.53 3.05 3.94 306.8M12 8.81 2.77 2.09 170.2 15.63 3.59 5.69 430.2M13 7.61 2.49 1.46 128.1 12.69 3.23 4.02 301.2M14 11.31 3.22 2.31 201.9 14.90 3.57 5.42 422.2342 dI N ,v Xvvh . ) , M12VCK, 7sY VCKM6) 2.182.14,7 OV v,v s.z N 3 f ,9 I N ,T M12K,vQ,=s.42 d H, ) s.2.3 ZI N Y ZI N YnV3.V3 ZI N YTable 3 The effect of different substrates formultion on Lycopersicum esculentum seedling qualit) TR M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 M13 M14GSI 7.13 6.11 6.20 7.58 8.76 6.21 6.56 6.90 6.83 629 8.12 9.88 7.67 10.06: =(Y/).Notes:Good seeding index=(stem diameter/stem height)dryweight.VV3 V A, ) I N GSIlv. ZWI N i“vs, M12I N r 9.88,v(10.06),c ZK, QM5(8.76)M1(8.12).M2 K,6.11.3 ) I N H, ? ?r, ?C C. ,V( ):V( F):V( )=6:2:2Kz,35 42 d HI N SvW (下轉第60頁)60 2 j v 37 3)-70 -20 Hq/,% s %/.yN i H aF% 4. iV, s ) “ “, P ? B ) , s 9E K . V B ) -4/, $ B s % HW,B.4) kTV , i s %KzA iZE, V i HW,v HW . Q -70 , T Hq HW = P,9 V4 -20 i. ID: 1 . 3L.syF A.m. Y 3 C.: jv, 1992.152-171. 2 _, i , BZ). 3/ Z J. 2 jv,2001,35(4):299-302. 3 9CA. 3L.$ M. Z: Z S/ ,1963.61-73. 4 HANAHAN D.Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmid J.J Mol Biol, 1983,166:557-580. 5 COHEN S N, CHANG A C Y, HSU L.Nonchromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacterial :Genetic transformation of Escherichia coliby R-factorDNA J.Proc Natl Acad Sci,1972,69:2110-2114. 6 DOWER W J,MILLER J F , RUGODULE C W.High efficiency transformation of E.coli by high-voltage electroporation J.NuclAcids Res,1988, 16(23):6127-6145. 7 SOMBROOD J,FRITSCH E F,MANIATIS T.s0 X H L 2.2 M . , ,r.: S,1992.(上接第56頁)s.yN, u, 35 42 dI N H, VT9 . I N - (28 d -) 3 ,vs v, 49. P, 3 Y.OZAWA 9;?C, T H - 3 , ( v a, “?r, 3r. k9 T, - (28d -) 3 , v s. V ? r!sc ,gA 4 31,9 V ? V cBt , 8y b#. k C C, C ,7 y 1B. ID: 1 , , .,. v # + J. j,1998,14(2):192-197. 2 ,f , i,.I N !?g 1 J. j,1998, 14(3):177-181. 3 ! , . M# Y J. 2 jv,2001,35(1):66-70. 4 ,;, T +,. R v rT J. + jv,2000,31(2):93-95. 5 *, ,f .g Z( 3Y J. 2 jv, 2002,36(1):70-74. 6 WORRALR.Compostingwood wastes forpottingmixes J.Australian Horticulture, 1985,9:34-37 7 POKORNY FA.Pine bark containermedia-an overview J.ProcInt Plant Prop Soc, 1979,29;484-495. 8 YAZAKY Y ,NICHOLS D.Phytotoxic components of pinus radiata bark J.Austr For Res,1978, 8:185-198. 9 OZAWA K, YAMAMUREM, OKADA M.Rice-chaff and soil composite asa culturemedium forvegetable seedlings J.Acta.Horti-culture,1992,319:407-412.