là ° ù:2005-11-12Á “:SE8639à “(2001AA247011);SE“ Eô” S/þ1 “(2001BA5031306); + j<vÐ M = SùÁ'ù “Teº:ü­(1972-), 3, Ê ¦,p V,¬ q,ö1V Y ! Ìâ eÅÐ v 3 Ø©ùîýT; Ù? ¹YßT。Ð ËI NÄþÉ Æ#É!s ¥¥Y楊延杰1 ,李天來1,林 多2 ,范文麗1 ,韓 凌1(1. + j<vÐóÐý, a 8 ! ó×Ä L i, a + 110161;2. jÐýó“, öê 265200)K1: °Ñ i =ùî Ð ËI NÄþÉ Æ# É!s ¥¥Y。²TV ü:Ï Ð çø×Y±éÄþÉ¥ Æs ¥, Hø×űéMg,K¥ l Æ,7N,P,Ca¥ ÆY l, Ð/ Ø9 ÃgKg。I N ÐÌâ/, Éí Í 2 =¥MÄ,N= ËÏ Æ ¥9ÉKv,Kô“Ï Æ ¥9ÉKv。7 3I N Ö“ ÐÌâ/¥ÄþÉ Æ /l¿ÛÄ Ö“。1oM: ÐI N;ÄþÉ É!Ïms Ë|:S641.2 ÓDS M :A ÓcI|:1000-7091(2006)03-0121-04Effectsof LowLight onDryMatterandMacronutrientAccumulationinDifferent TypeTomatoYANG Yan-jie 1, LI Tian-lai1, LIN Duo2,FAN Wen-li1, HAN Ling1(1.Horticultural College, ShenyangAgricultural University, Liaoning Province Key Laboratory ofGreenhouseHorticulture, Shenyang 110161,China;2.Horticulture Department, Laiyang AgriculturalCollege, Laiyang 265200,China )Abstract:The effects of low light on dry matteraccumulation and macronutrient allocation in tomatowere studied inthis paper.The results showed that the dry matter accumulation in plant was seriously decreased in light density lowerthan 50%control condition.Theabsorption of magnesiumand potassiumby tomato plantwas restrained by low light den-sity, only little restrained at nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium.Enhancing application magnesium and potassium fertiliz-ers for the improvementof tomatogrowth and development in low light density condition was important.The accumulationchange ofmacronutrientwere differentin root, stem, and leaf .Nitrogen increment ratewas themostin leaf, and potassi-umwas in root.The decrease of dry matter accumulation was smaller in wild type line than aetiolated type line.Keywords:Low light;Tomato;Dry matter;MacronutrientÐ ! T 3Á¥ö1ÌâKÅy Í­B,;vVZ ëYTþ¥È 3É?â。Bî f /, Û“;v¥9 <,TþÇT¨9<,7 O É!s¥³ p 99F。MQ, Û“;vh Ð,TþÇT¨/,7 O É!¥³ p Æ9h 。¿1 p;v <¥I N ª÷ ÂN。 7,µ1 ÐI N;T¨É! lY¥ùî ÙµBt¡,;vYI N É!³ p ÆZ ë¥ùî §×¿N,P,K¥ Æ9 ¥MÄ,7¿±é 2 l ÆN,P,K ,Ca,Mg #tí!бéÄþÉ Æ¥1“Z ë¥ùî , O²Tµs v 1 3 ,³ÉBùî。'ùîYV;v/ 0 ÐI N Ö“Ð 0 Ð Ö“¥ÄþÉ Æ Éí Íò 2 =¥s ¥? p¥1 , ù ü Ð/I N¥ É!³ p+,É7¹華北農學報·2006 , 21(3):121-124Ø« ÐI N 3É?â¥Y4G 。1 材料和方法1.1 k ' k¿2003 M=1 + j<vÐó Sù¹ + °Ñ i =É。 3É <¥ ¡I N Ö“(7 3,W) 3É Ð¥ ¡IN Ö“(ÛÄlM8,Y)¹ k。2003 M121 °lÕ,327 °±éÉÀ5 Ë= Hç±。ç± -¨ª g75 000 kg/hm2 , U Í300 kg/hm2 、Ö=Ï300 kg/hm2 、 ; ÖK450 kg/hm2 , I, 55cm,é 35 cm,Ä¥?！?Ð) Ø,È?ZE ¡5 Ø。1.2 k !9k¨ Û uF !9,I Nç±Ï ì7 dª,¨i; q¥ Ñ i = ¡I NÉ Ð) Ø, P) Ø =¥vsY¹1 ; <¥75%( Ð)、50%(Ï Ð)25%(× Ð),Ñ i =1 ; <¹v,3Qׯ, Ä) Ø18é。 k ùW¥ d µ? , ! =1 ; <¹950 1120mol/(m2·s),) Ø <sY¹710 874(75%; <)、465.5 621(50%; <)245 270 mol/(m2·s)(25%; <)。1.3 kZEI N¿ Ð) Ø21 dª(04 -23) |“。|±éá Îs³¹ô、Ô、=T L,105 ê ½15 minª,70/ÄÀ×,sYë Äþת,x ÞþV© d°å¹0.28 mm¥r ñ,¿Ä2 =%i,!s¨。¨ £ Ö )-Q o Ö )1 äE©çNc 4 ,¨M¬Û1 äE©çPc 5 ,¨TAS-986ð0 ls;9E©çK,Ca,Mg¥c 。W.7 3I N Ö“Wild type line;Y.ÛÄI N Ö“Aetiolated type line,/m1 ;v <I N±éÄþÉ Æ¥YFig.1 Effectsofdifferentlightintensity ondry matteraccumulation in tomatoplant2 結果與分析2.1 ÐI NÄþÉ Æ¥YÐI N±é¥ÄþÉ Æµ üA¥Y(m1)。I N ;(75%i; q)Ìâ/,ÄþÉ ÆKv,7 3I N Ö“W¥ÄþÉ Æ 9F(25.7%)v¿ÛÄ Ö“Y(14.1%);= Ë©! 2=¥ÄþÉ Æ 9F v,T LÏ¥ÄþÉs¥1 qÐÃÉ Ð¥) ØMÍ, y¹) Ø¥ <710 874mol/(m2·s);I N 3ÉK aR; <S¶ =;±éBWVC= ë9v,ÔÌM% Ð,T LÁ 9 µ/, y¹±é =;v </y71vµ。7Ï(50%i; q)×(25%i;q) Ø¥v < üA®¿I N 3É¥ aR; <,)تI N¥!8T LÄþÉ Æ (/,±é3É üA пv,Á /,ÛÄI N¥½ qx sÚ , Tø×。 ª ü,;v <¥11, ! = ;I N±é¥ÄþÉ ÆÁ µÉT¨7i; q®¿1 ;v¥50%(; 0Y á¹465.5 621 mol/(m2·s) H,I N±é¥ÄþÉ Æü sø×Y,/î 3É?â , 0 Ð µ¥ÛÄI N Ö“Y÷v, 4¿N ÐÌâ/ ¡。122 華 北 農 學 報 21卷V1 ÐI N±éN,P, K, Ca, Mg Æ¥YTab.1 Effectsoflowlightintensityon N, P,K, Ca, Mgaccumulationin tomatoplant “Item i; q(%)Relative light intensity25 50 75 100 Nc NitrogencontentW(mg/é) 263.39 648.75 662.66 741.651ckh (%) 64.49 12.53 10.65Y(mg/é) 70.07 73.67 108.52 98.331ckh (%) 28.74 25.08 -10.36Pc PhosphoruscontentW(mg/é) 23.01 47.99 46.93 70.251ckh (%) 67.25 31.68 33.20Y(mg/é) 2.79 3.65 3.99 4.721ckh (%) 40.96 22.70 15.55Kc PotassiumcontentW(mg/é) 224.85 540.89 602.89 868.991ckh (%) 74.13 37.76 30.62Y(mg/é) 52.70 65.50 114.00 105.421ckh (%) 50.01 37.87 -8.14Cac CalciumcontentW(mg/é) 125.40 234.00 267.60 402.301ckh (%) 68.84 41.83 33.47Y (mg/é) 53.00 65.50 94.00 98.501ckh (%) 46.19 33.50 4.57Mgc MagnesiumcontentW(mg/é) 89.08 179.83 227.70 352.091ckh (%) 74.70 48.93 35.33Y(mg/é) 19.92 21.10 45.70 44.331ckh (%) 55.06 52.41 -3.09m2 ÐI NÏN,P, K, Ca, Mg Æs ¥¥YFig.2 Effectoflowlightintensity onaccumulation and allocationofnitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calciumandmagnesiumintomatoplant3期 楊延杰等:弱光對不同類型番茄干物質積累及礦質營養(yǎng)分配的影響 123 2.2 ÐI N±é Éí Í Æ¥Y;) Ø21 dª,I N Éí Í Æ C üA¥µs(V1)。 ;) Ø(75 %i; q)±é Éí Í Æ í üAY,®¿ aR;v <S¶ =,ÛÄ Ö“I NYNHq/N ,K,Mg¥ l .À9F。Ï) Ø(50%i;q) Éí Í lY v。×) Ø(25%i; q) Éí Í lYKv。ÐvM1,25%i; q/±é Éí Í Æ /¹7 3I N Ö“W 64.49% 74.70%,ÛÄ Ö“Y28.74% 55.06%。 Ð Éí Í l Æ¥Y,Mg¥YKv, Q¹K ,Ca,P,N¥YKl。 ª üI N! 3É ù ÐÌâ/¹ ¡±é 3É,ô“ª5 l%îµ1¥!,7Á Ö0 l sKÅ。M Ð/±é 3É ¥®,±é =¥Nc VÚ,a eÅ,E çV /î ¶nÁ±énÉ。2.3 Ð Éí ÍI Nò 2 =s ¥¥YI N ÐÌâ/ 3É21 dª,ò 2 =¥Éí Í Æ (Ä×9)¥s²TV ü(m2),NCa= ËÏ Æ Kv,ò 2c (9F,× Ð/c µ/ t , Ö“W¥ÔCac 6ÚKô“Ï¥ Æ Kv,Ï/ ÐHKc Û <ñ9F79F,Ï ÐH,c /;Pòñ 2 =¥ Æ MÄMÍ,ô“Ï Æ K ;Mg Ð/= Ëc 6Ú,ôÔÏc ×ç,Ï Ð H,= ËÏMgc ®,ÔÏc 6Ú(W) û×ç(Y),ô“c /。ÈvÌâ/,7 3I NÖ“WÐÛÄI N Ö“Yòñ 2¥N,Cac Mµ l,77 3I N Ö“¥Pc ®¿ÛÄI N Ö“,Kc Ú¿ÛÄI N Ö“,7 3I N Ö“Ü Ð) ت Éí Íò 2 =¥4Úv¿ÛÄI N Ö“。3 結論與討論k²TV ü, ;Hq/(75%; <,710 874 mol/(m2·s)I N¥ÄþÉ ÆÅT¨ l,; <®¿Èv¥50%(465.5 621mol/(m2·s) HYF×, ÏÄþÉ_T L=¥s ¥ Æ YK¹ø× <®I N±é Éí Í l Æ 9µ v¥Y,=1¡I N; <®¿621 mol/(m2·s)(50%; <) Hø×Å ±éMg,K¥ l Æ,7N,P,Ca¥ l ÆY l。yN ÐÌâ/¹ P±ér,ªÄðµ¥S g8“,¿±é Éí Í¥³ p1 è Ø ¨g , Ø9 ÃgKg,Ð/±éô“ 3É l, l ë l ? ï®, V I n= ë ¨ 。I N ÐÌâ/, Éí Í 2 = Æ ¥MÄ,Pòñ 2 =¥ Æ MÍ,NCa= ËÏ Æ ¥9ÉKv,Kô“Ï Æ ¥9ÉKv,Mgc ÖÕWVCµs。 ÐÌâ/, 0 Ð¥7 3I N Ö“W, Éí Í Æ 1 0 Ð¥ÛÄI N Ö“Y¥h v, ö1 ®¿ ÐIâ/î±éÄþÉ Æh v¿!í Í l h ,V7 PÊÄ×±é8 =¥!íÍc 6¥ø#。ÐShaheenGizaway¥²T'BÁ 2, 6 。yN, ?ÇÇYV±é8 = Éí Í¥ l Æ I N¥ 0 Ð <Ð,Î I nÐÁ M1¥ ð 3É?â·S。À¿±é8ò 2 = Æ¥ Éí Í µr¹Ð ±é8È¥ 3 Ø,Î û ÿ%A ÏÊ Æ Y±é¥ 3É?âγÉBùî。 IÓD: 1 Dijk S J,Van de.Differences between genotypes of tomato infoliar contents of total phosphorus, total nitrogen and nitratenitrogen under low light intensity and low night temperatures J .JAgri Sci, 1986, 34:49-55. 2 El-GizawyA M, ComaaH M.Effect of different shading lev-els on tomato plants.1.Growth, flowering and chemicalcomposition J .ActaHorticulture, 1992, 323:341-347. 3 Masuda M, Shimada Y.Diurnal changes in mineral concen-trations of xylem exudates in tomato plants and their concen-trations as affected by sunlight intensity and plant ages J .Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science,1993,61(4):839-845. 4 fDñ. £ Ö )Q o Ö )1 äE©ç9 : f¥ùî J .ÏS j< SÐ, 1999,1:85-88.5 ø 6.r g ïùîE M .Ø: j<ñ,1988. 6 Shaheen A M , Helal R M.Seedling production of someveg-etables under plastic houses adifferent levels of light intensi-ties J .Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 1996, 22(2): 175-192.124 華 北 農 學 報 21卷